binman: Add support for building x86 ROMs with SPL
When building for 64-bit x86 we need an SPL binary in the ROM. Add support for this. Also increase entry test code coverage to 100%. Signed-off-by:Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Tested-by:
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Showing
- tools/binman/etype/u_boot_dtb_with_ucode.py 3 additions, 1 deletiontools/binman/etype/u_boot_dtb_with_ucode.py
- tools/binman/etype/u_boot_spl_bss_pad.py 26 additions, 0 deletionstools/binman/etype/u_boot_spl_bss_pad.py
- tools/binman/etype/u_boot_spl_with_ucode_ptr.py 28 additions, 0 deletionstools/binman/etype/u_boot_spl_with_ucode_ptr.py
- tools/binman/etype/x86_start16_spl.py 17 additions, 0 deletionstools/binman/etype/x86_start16_spl.py
- tools/binman/func_test.py 88 additions, 0 deletionstools/binman/func_test.py
- tools/binman/test/37_x86_no_ucode.dts 20 additions, 0 deletionstools/binman/test/37_x86_no_ucode.dts
- tools/binman/test/38_x86_ucode_missing_node.dts 26 additions, 0 deletionstools/binman/test/38_x86_ucode_missing_node.dts
- tools/binman/test/39_x86_ucode_missing_node2.dts 23 additions, 0 deletionstools/binman/test/39_x86_ucode_missing_node2.dts
- tools/binman/test/40_x86_ucode_not_in_image.dts 28 additions, 0 deletionstools/binman/test/40_x86_ucode_not_in_image.dts
- tools/binman/test/41_unknown_pos_size.dts 11 additions, 0 deletionstools/binman/test/41_unknown_pos_size.dts
- tools/binman/test/44_x86_optional_ucode.dts 30 additions, 0 deletionstools/binman/test/44_x86_optional_ucode.dts
- tools/binman/test/u_boot_no_ucode_ptr 0 additions, 0 deletionstools/binman/test/u_boot_no_ucode_ptr
- tools/binman/test/u_boot_no_ucode_ptr.c 15 additions, 0 deletionstools/binman/test/u_boot_no_ucode_ptr.c
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment