Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Select Git revision
7 results
Search by author
  • Any Author
  • onny onny onny
1 author
  1. Sep 10, 2008
  3. Sep 09, 2008
  5. Aug 12, 2008
  7. Aug 10, 2008
  9. Jul 09, 2008
  11. Jun 10, 2008
  13. May 23, 2008
  15. May 10, 2008
  17. May 09, 2008
  19. Apr 29, 2008
    • Guennadi Liakhovetski's avatar
      net: make ARP timeout configurable · 40cb90ee
      Guennadi Liakhovetski authored 
      
Currently the timeout waiting for an ARP reply is hard set to 5 seconds.
On i.MX31ADS due to a hardware "strangeness" up to four first IP packets
to the boards get lost, which typically are ARP replies. By configuring
the timeout to a lower value we significantly improve the first network
transfer time on this board. The timeout is specified in milliseconds,
later internally it is converted to deciseconds, because it has to be
converted to hardware ticks, and CFG_HZ ranges from 900 to 27000000 on
different boards.

Signed-off-by: default avatarGuennadi Liakhovetski <lg@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarBen Warren <biggerbadderben@gmail.com>
      40cb90ee
  21. Apr 18, 2008
  23. Apr 12, 2008
  25. Apr 08, 2008
  27. Apr 01, 2008
  29. Mar 30, 2008
  31. Mar 28, 2008
  33. Mar 27, 2008
    • Stefan Roese's avatar
      ppc: Add CFG_MEM_TOP_HIDE option to hide memory area that doesn't get "touched" · 14f73ca6
      Stefan Roese authored 
      
If CFG_MEM_TOP_HIDE is defined in the board config header, this specified
memory area will get subtracted from the top (end) of ram and won't get
"touched" at all by U-Boot. By fixing up gd->ram_size the Linux kernel
should gets passed the now "corrected" memory size and won't touch it
either. This should work for arch/ppc and arch/powerpc. Only Linux board
ports in arch/powerpc with bootwrapper support, which recalculate the
memory size from the SDRAM controller setup, will have to get fixed
in Linux additionally.

This patch enables this config option on some PPC440EPx boards as a workaround
for the CHIP 11 errata. Here the description from the AMCC documentation:

CHIP_11: End of memory range area restricted access.
Category: 3

Overview:
The 440EPx DDR controller does not acknowledge any
transaction which is determined to be crossing over the
end-of-memory-range boundary, even if the starting address is
within valid memory space. Any such transaction from any PLB4
master will result in a PLB time-out on PLB4 bus.

Impact:
In case of such misaligned bursts, PLB4 masters will not
retrieve any data at all, just the available data up to the
end of memory, especially the 440 CPU. For example, if a CPU
instruction required an operand located in memory within the
last 7 words of memory, the DCU master would burst read 8
words to update the data cache and cross over the
end-of-memory-range boundary. Such a DCU read would not be
answered by the DDR controller, resulting in a PLB4 time-out
and ultimately in a Machine Check interrupt. The data would
be inaccessible to the CPU.

Workaround:
Forbid any application to access the last 256 bytes of DDR
memory. For example, make your operating system believe that
the last 256 bytes of DDR memory are absent. AMCC has a patch
that does this, available for Linux.

This patch sets CFG_MEM_TOP_HIDE for the following 440EPx boards:
lwmon5, korat, sequoia

The other remaining 440EPx board were intentionally not included
since it is not clear to me, if they use the end of ram for some
other purpose. This is unclear, since these boards have CONFIG_PRAM
defined and even comments like this:

PMC440.h:
/* esd expects pram at end of physical memory.
 * So no logbuffer at the moment.
 */

It is strongly recommended to not use the last 256 bytes on those
boards too. Patches from the board maintainers are welcome.

Signed-off-by: default avatarStefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
      14f73ca6
  35. Mar 26, 2008
  37. Mar 19, 2008
  39. Mar 16, 2008
  41. Mar 12, 2008
  43. Feb 14, 2008
    • Wolfgang Denk's avatar
      PPC: Use r2 instead of r29 as global data pointer · e7670f6c
      Wolfgang Denk authored 
      
R29 was an unlucky choice as with recent toolchains (gcc-4.2.x) gcc
will refuse to use load/store multiple insns; instead, it issues a
list of simple load/store instructions upon function entry and exit,
resulting in bigger code size, which in turn makes the build for a
few boards fail.

Use r2 instead.

Signed-off-by: default avatarWolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
      e7670f6c
  45. Feb 05, 2008